Boston Global Forum Expresses Solidarity with Paris

Boston Global Forum Expresses Solidarity with Paris

images

Paris is in our minds and hearts at this tragic moment. 

We extend our sincere condolences to the entire French nation, and all those victims of the terrorist attacks.

This second attack on France by extremists in 2015 is a declaration of war on all the values that both France and the world hold most dear. The victims could be any of us. But we must go on and not be deterred by these horrible terrorist acts. Otherwise they win.

The Boston Global Forum ( BGF) will give a statement with initiatives, and call Members of our Young Leaders Network for Peace and Security (YLNP), to help and support France in this terrible time, and continue to contribute to long-term and lasting peace and security in the world.

Nguyen Anh Tuan
Chief Executive Officer,
Boston Global Forum

Boston Global Forum’s Initiative: Pacific Security Alliance to maintain peace in South China Sea

Boston Global Forum’s Initiative: Pacific Security Alliance to maintain peace in South China Sea

Cambridge, MA (Oct 17, 2015): Boston Global Forum hosted an international conference on October 16 at Harvard Faculty Club to seek for solution initiatives for armed conflicts potential in the South China Sea, given the large-scale land reclamation and militarization possibility from China in its occupied islands in the Spratlys.

Gov Dukakis

Governor Michael Dukakis, Chairman of Boston Global Forum, moderated the BGF’s discussion on October 16, 2015 at Harvard Faculty Club.

The conference attracts participation and discussion of several notable experts in international affair and foreign policy, including:

  • David E. Sanger, Chief Washington correspondent of the New York Times;
  • Professor Joseph S. Nye Jr., Member of Board of Thinkers, Boston Global Forum; Harvard University Distinguished Service Professor
  • Bonnie S. Glaser, Senior Advisor for Asia and Director of China Power Project at Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS);
  • Bill Hayton, TV journalist of BBC World News TV and author of “The South China Sea: The Struggle for Power in Asia” (Yale University Press, 2014);
  • Grant F Rhode, Research Associate in Fairbank Center for Chinese Studies at Harvard University;
  • Professor Sean P. Henseler, Director of Operations of Operational Level Programs at U.S. Naval War College, Newport, Rhode Island;
  • Richard Javad Heydarian, Assistant Professor in political science in De La Salle University (Philippines) and author of “Asia’s New Battlefield: US, China, and the Struggle for Western Pacific” (Zed, London);
  • Professor Suzanne Ogden, Professor emeritus in Department of Political Science at Northeastern University;
  • Brent Colburn, former Assistant to the U.S Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs;
  • Llewellyn King, Co-Host and Executive Producer of PBS’s “White House Chronicle”;
  • Lei Guo, Assistant Professor in Division of Emerging Media Studies at BU’s College of Communication

Most updated information about China’s land reclamation activities was provided and its underlying objectives for these actions are discussed. All discussants expressed a growing concern on the possibility of militarization and condemened China’s growing assertion in South China Sea, including the reclamation of rocks and islands in the disputed Spratly Islands. Apparently, Chinese moves attempted to change the status quo in the South China Sea, which is in violation of the United Nations’ Clause of Seas as well as the Declaration of Conduct signed among China and ASEAN countries, threatened the peace, stability and maritime security in the Pacific region.

IMG_1626 (2)

David Sanger, Chief Washington correspondent of the New York Times, made the first keynote speech in the conference.

David Sanger, Chief Washington correspondent of the New York Times, said “The biggest question is can you persuade Chinese that most of what they are doing now is taking the other regional players and driving them into American?

Bill Hayton, the journalist of BBC World News TV, also shared his thought: “The significance of China’s island building lies less in what it has done so far than in what it might be about to do”. “In my view, concern should focus on three areas of sea: the Vanguard Bank, off the Vietnamese coast; the Reed Bank, off the Philippines coast; and around the Luconia Shoals and James Shoal, off the Malaysian coast. All three have significant oil and gas potential. That’s not to say that hydrocarbons are the sole reason for China’s island building. There are many motivations – reflecting China’s many security interests and its many internal lobbies.” he added. “I don’t believe it [China’s claim and physical presence over the Spratlys] will end until China occupies every land feature in the sea and controls the sea spaces in between.”, Hayton stressed his thought.

bil hayton

Bill Hayton, TV journalist of BBC World News TV and author of “The South China Sea: The Struggle for Power in Asia” (Yale University Press, 2014) join the conference from London.

Discussion also referred to the statements of President Xi Jinping in his recent US visit. However, the delegates noted the fact that there exists a gap between words and deeds of Chinese leaders. Hopefully this time, Chinese leaders will prove their good will in words and deed.

Besides of providing updates on recent developments of islands done by China in Spratlys, participants also discussed resolutions to maintain peace, stability and maritime security in South China Sea. All stressed that no claimant is allowed to pursue measures of violence or militarization to assert their claims on disputed islands. Bonnie Glaser, the CSIS’s senior adviser for Asia, added a new thought: “… I think demilitarization in South China Sea is not achievable. The question is – what is achievable? ….I think maybe it is potential to have militarization, so the claimants could agree, for example, on weapon system and capabilities that would not be deployed on land features in South China Sea”.

bonnie

Bonnie S. Glaser, Senior Advisor for Asia and Director of China Power Project at Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS), participated from Washington D.C.

Participants also emphasized the importance of US presence in the region in the context that regional organizations are not powerful enough to enforce the international law. However, the United States — cannot do it alone, but would play a significant role as a safeguard to prevent any escalation of tension into conflict.

Changing China’s actions really require a more effective strategy. In my view, the US cannot do this alone. The other claimants along with neighbors who have interest in the South China Sea should work together to shape the Chinese decision making. For example, willing members of ASEAN could draft a Code of Conduct and work to convince others members to sign it. And even it is unsuccessful, the process would insert pressure on China to engage more seriously in COC negotiation”, Glaser suggested.

Professor Thomas E. Patterson

Professor Thomas Patterson,  Co-founder and Member of BGF Board of Directors, Bradlee Professor of Government and the Press, Harvard Kennedy School briefed out the BGF’s report “Chinese Disputes in the South China Sea: Risks and Solutions for the Asia-Pacific.”

Nevertheless, in a longer term, it is essential to have a new regional framework to ensure and supervise the enforcement of international laws. Professor Thomas Patterson, BGF’s Co-founder, briefed out the BGF’s report on disputes in the South China Sea and announced the report’s suggestion of a more strengthened alliance network in Asia in order to halt China’s actions. Such alliance would be called the Pacific Security Alliance (PSA). The PSA should include United States, Japan, Australia, South Korea, Vietnam, Philippines, and others who wish to join. China can also be invited if it is ready to prove with its speech and actions a commitment to international norms, standards, and regulations to keep peace and security in the Pacific region. Governor Dukakis, chairman of BGF, reiterated in his closing remarks that “the mission of the PSA is to lead joint patrols in the South China Sea, if and to the extent that the Permanent Court of Arbitration does not solve the dispute. Joint international patrols will be crucial to operationalizing peace and security in the Pacific.”

More other views are shared by several notable experts.

David E. Sanger, Chief Washington correspondent of The New York Times:

Professor Joseph S. Nye Jr., Member of Board of Thinkers, Boston Global Forum; Harvard University Distinguished Service Professor:

Bill Hayton, TV journalist, BBC World News TV; Author of “The South China Sea: The Struggle for Power in Asia” (Yale University Press, 2014):

Bonnie Glaser, Senior Adviser for Asia and Director, China Power Project,  Center for Strategic & International Studies:

Richard Javad Heydarian, Assistant Professor in political science, De La Salle University (Philippines); Author of “Asia’s New Battlefield: US, China, and the Struggle for Western Pacific” (Zed, London):

Professor Sean P. Henseler, Director of Operations, Operational Level Programs, U.S. Naval War College, Newport, Rhode Island:

Grant F. Rhode, PhD, Visiting Researcher, Center for the Study of Asia, Boston University; Research Associate, Fairbank Center for Chinese Studies, Harvard University:

Brent Colburn, Fellow of Institute of Politics, Harvard  University; Former Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs:

Tsutomu Himeno, Consul General of Japan in Boston:

Dr. Lei Guo, Assistant Professor, Division of Emerging Media Studies, College of Communication, Boston University:

Professor Suzanne Ogden, Member of Editorial Board, Boston Global Forum,  Professor emeritus, Department of Political Science &  Faculty associate, Center for Emerging Markets, Northeastern University:

Llewellyn King, Member, Boston Global Forum Editorial Board; Co-Host,  Executive Producer of “White House Chronicle”, PBS:

Professor Fumio Ota, Former Professor, Defense Academy of Japan (2005 – 2013; Professor Mitoji Yabunaka, Professor of Ritsumeikan University; Former Vice-Minister for Foreign Affairs, Government of Japan (2008-2010); and Mr. Hiroyuki Akita, Nikkei senior staff writer:

Boston Global Forum Report: “Chinese Disputes in the South China Sea: Risks and Solutions for the Asia-Pacific.”

BGF report

DOWNLOAD HERE

VIDEO: The Ethics Code of Conduct for Cyber Peace and Security Conference

VIDEO: The Ethics Code of Conduct for Cyber Peace and Security Conference

(Boston, MA) – The Boston Global Forum was pleased to successful host the conference on building the Ethics Code of Conduct for Cyber Peace and Security, which was held at Harvard Faculty Club on September 25, 2015.

The conference focused on three major issues:

  • report of current development on cyber security
  • discussions on developing the Ethics Code of Conduct for Peace and Security (ECCC0
  • solutions to apply ECCC

The discussion attracted participation of Harvard professor Thomas Patterson; MIT professor Robert Desimone, Tokyo’s State Minister for Foreign Affair Mr. Yasuhide Nakayama, ambassador Ichiro Fujisaki, and professor Fumio Ota; and several experts on cyber security: Ryan Maness, Visiting Fellow of Security and Resilience Studies, Department of Political Science, Northeastern University; Theodore J. Gordon, Co-founder and Board Director, Millennium Project; Jaclyn A. Kerr, Research Fellow, The Cyber Project, Harvard Kennedy School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs;

The conference also featured discussions of Members of Young Leaders Network for Peace and Security, Ms. Jenny Q. Ta, Member of Young Leaders Network for Peace and Security, Boston Global Forum; Founder and CEO, Sqeeqee  and Michael Dukakis Leadership Fellows who will directly involved in promoting the implementation of the Ethics Code of Conduct for Cyber peace and security: Jeremy Samide, Co-Founder, Stealthcare, LLC; Bill Ottman, Founder and CEO of Minds.com; Roya Mahboob, TIME magazine’s 100 Most Influential People In The World for 201; CEO, the Afghan Citadel Software Company; Shubhranshu Choudhary, Foreign Policy’s Top 100 Global Leading Thinkers of 2014; Founder of CGNet Swara; Nguyen Thi Chau Giang, Composer, Pianist, and Painter.

Watch the Full Conference here:

The Ethics Code of Conduct for Cyber Peace and Security (ECCC) Version 1.0

The Ethics Code of Conduct for Cyber Peace and Security (ECCC) Version 1.0

(September 23, 2015) –  Boston Global Forum (BGF) is developing an Ethics Code of Conduct for Cyber Peace and Security (ECCC) that prescribes Internet behaviors.

A draft version of that code, ECCC Version 1.0, is conceived and developed by BGF’s CEO Nguyen Anh Tuan. The draft also received contributions from from cyber security observers and experts.

The ECCC Version 1.0 expressed ideas and viewpoints which are co-authored by:

  • Governor Michael Dukakis, Co-Founder, and Chairman of Boston Global Forum
  • Nguyen Anh Tuan, Co-Founder, and CEO of Boston Global Forum
  • Professor Thomas Patterson, Co-Founder, and Member of Board of Directors, Boston Global Forum
  • Professor John Quelch, Co-Founder, and Member of Board of Directors, Boston Global Forum
  • Professor Carlos Alberto Torres, Member of Board of Thinkers, Boston Global Forum

The ECCC Version 1.0 is now open for discussion and contribution by Members of Boston Global Forum’s Young Leaders Network for Peace and Security. It also welcomes contribution of other individuals and groups to make a complete version of ECCC for a more safer and healthy cyber world.

Members of Young Leaders Network for Peace and Security (YLNP ), and Michael Dukakis Leadership Fellows will contribute to develop next versions of ECCC.

BGF invites suggestions for amending and strengthening ECCC Version 1.0 for the purpose of preparing a new version, ECCC Version 2.0, by December 2015

_______________

THE ETHICS CODE OF CONDUCT FOR CYBER PEACE AND SECURITY (ECCC)

Version 1.0

The Boston Global Forum’s Ethics Code of Conduct for Cyber Peace and Security (ECCC) encompasses the following behaviors in all Internet communication, relationships and transactions.

Net Citizens: Ethics Code of Conduct for Cyber Peace and Security

Behavior toward others:

  • Be honest
  • Show respect
  • Avoid disreputable acts, and denounce those of others
  • Do not think or act involve with cyber terrorism.

Behavior towards information:

  • Assess its reliability before accepting it
  • Do not distribute unreliable or erroneous information

Behavior in discussions:

  • Do not endorse other’s comments when information has not been verified
  • Do not post negative comments on people’s private lives
  • Do not share or comment on unverified or unreliable defamatory claims about brands, organizations, or public figures
  • Be constructive, respective, and encouraging in comments

 Policy Makers: Ethics Code of Conduct for Cyber Peace and Security

  • Do not establish, support, or endorse policies harmful to the Cyberspace environment
  • Do not unfairly criticize institutions, organizations, and brands
  • Do not unfairly criticize political opponents or other countries as using unverified, unreliable information etc.
  • Do not engage at any level in cyber spying, whether the target is an individual, firm, institution, or country
  • Do not engage in taking or disseminating private personal information
  • Do not engage or support in any form of cyber wars.

 IT Engineers: Ethics Code of Conduct for Cyber Peace and Security

  • Develop products to enhance cybersecurity
  • Do not create or distribute Internet viruses
  • Do not launch denial-of-service (DoS) attacks
  • Do not attack, disable, or steal information resources
  • Do not blackmail or otherwise threaten any person or organization
  • Do not deliberately create gaps in Internet security, and report any that are discovered
  • Do not use and distribute private information about individuals or organizations
  • Do not engage or assist in any form of cyberterrorism

Business Firms and Business Leaders: Ethics Code of Conduct for Cyber Peace and Security

  • Take steps to secure company information
  • Do not unfairly attack other companies
  • Do not attack other governments
  • Do not use products or systems that operate counter to a free and open Internet
  • Do not invest in products or systems that go against the humane values of a free and open Internet.

 Educators, Influencers/Institutions: Ethics Code of Conduct for Cyber Peace and Security

  • Do not disseminate or support negative opinions, doctrines that discourage the implementation of Cyber security measures
  • Educate and lead global citizens to support and execute ECCC
  • Propose solutions to build awareness of the value of ECCC and encourage its implementation
  • Foster public opinions that against bad behaviors such as theft of private data and information for distribution on the Internet.
  • Encourage those who use the Internet for purposes that contribute to a better life for all of mankind.
  • Create honors and awards to recognize outstanding individuals who contribute greatly for a secure and safe Cyberspace environment.

 # # #

The U.S and other claimants in the South China Sea should take the initiative to promote a common understanding on what might be defined as “no militarization”

The U.S and other claimants in the South China Sea should take the initiative to promote a common understanding on what might be defined as “no militarization”

(October 17, 2015)-  China’s President Xi Jinping did provide no definition to the term “militaritization” for its actions in the South China Sea, and in the view of Bonnie Glaser, the senior adviser for Asia and director of China Power Project at Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS), she suspected that US and China really do have different understanding about this.

“I think demilitarization in South China Sea is not achievable. The question is – what is achievable? So I like to be a little bit more constructive on what we got. I think maybe it is potential to have militarization, so the claimants could agree, for example, on weapon system and capabilities that would not be deployed on land features  in South China Sea.”, she added.

Bonnie, from Washington D.C, made her keynote speech on the Boston Global Forum’s conference, “Dangerous Situation and Solutions for Peace and Security
in the South China Sea”, on October 16, 2015 which was held at Harvard Faculty Club. Other notable delegates include David Sanger, the Chief Washington correspondent of the New York Times; Bill Hayton, author of “The South China Sea: The Struggle for Power in Asia” (Yale University Press, 2014); and Professor Sean P. Henseler, Director of Operations, Operational Level Programs, U.S. Naval War College, Newport, Rhode Island.

Watch her viewpoint here: