by Editor BGF | Oct 13, 2026 | Shinzo Abe Initiative for Peace and Security, News
The Boston Global Forum (BGF) plans to participate in SusHi Tech Tokyo 2027, presenting AIWS Civilization — a vision for Human–AI Co-Creation — as part of the Shinzo Abe Initiative for Peace and Security.
BGF’s participation is being coordinated by Yasuhide Nakayama, Member of Japan’s House of Representatives, a member of BGF’s Board of Directors, BGF’s Representative in Japan and Taiwan, and Coordinator of the Shinzo Abe Initiative.
SusHi Tech Tokyo 2027 takes place May 20–22, 2027, at Tokyo Big Sight, with two business days followed by a public day. This year the event centers on what humans should be in the age of AI transformation.
BGF aims to answer that question with AIWS Civilization: people who remain in command of AI and grow in judgment, creativity, and dignity. It will introduce AIWS Trust Infrastructure, Human–AI Co-Creation, and AIWS Lumina, founded on the values of Love, Creativity, Nobility, and Wisdom.
The groundwork was laid on March 31, 2026, when Nguyen Anh Tuan and Yasuhide Nakayama met Tokyo Governor Yuriko Koike and proposed AIWS Trust Infrastructure, AIWS Trust Order, and AIWS Lumina for SusHi Tech Tokyo 2027.
Through this engagement, the Shinzo Abe Initiative connects Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s legacy of leadership and international cooperation with the responsibilities of the AI Age: building trust, protecting human dignity, and enabling people and nations to co-create a peaceful and prosperous future.
For further information, visit the official SusHi Tech Tokyo 2027 website.
Tokyo Governor Yuriko Koike and Yasuhide Nakayama, Member of Japan’s House of Representatives and Coordinator of the Shinzo Abe Initiative
by Editor BGF | Oct 13, 2026 | News, Shaping Futures
On October 6, OpenAI posted 722 mathematical manuscripts produced by an unreleased internal model, which the company says represent progress on 372 open problems. Only 162 came with main results checked in the Lean proof assistant. Within a day, three were withdrawn after a sign error broke one argument and two that depended on it. OpenAI acknowledged that many of the results are not yet understood by its own mathematicians.
A month earlier, on September 4, Anthropic reported that Claude, working largely autonomously for 11 days by the company’s account, had formalized Fermat’s Last Theorem in about 13 million lines of Lean. The code was released for inspection; it is machine-checkable, not a proof a human can read.
Two releases, two answers to the same new fact: machines can now produce mathematics faster than humans can referee it. One released claims ahead of verification; the other released verification that no person can read through.
The deeper question concerns humanity, not the machines. A result proven by a machine becomes humanity’s knowledge only when people can understand it, explain it, and build on it. This is the principle of Beacon Papers No. 15, The Human Advancement Test: better output does not, by itself, demonstrate human advancement. As discovery accelerates, the measure of progress is not how many theorems machines produce, but how much human understanding grows with them.
→ Read: Beacon Papers No. 15 — The Human Advancement Test
by Editor BGF | Oct 13, 2026 | Global Alliance for Digital Governance
In a BBC interview published October 12, Microsoft President Brad Smith called for an international framework of AI safety rules, observing that milk and washing machines face more oversight than artificial intelligence. His proposals:
- independent evaluation of frontier models before release
- mandatory reporting of AI incidents
- a duty to notify organizations breached by rogue AI agents
- an emergency brake to pause systems that go wrong
Two days earlier, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella urged companies to treat AI models as insiders that may be compromised, and to keep the power to stop them mid-task in human hands.
These remain calls for policy, not rules in force. The Boston Global Forum welcomes them. When the leaders of one of the world’s largest AI companies ask for binding safeguards, the question is no longer whether such rules are needed, but how they will work.
The AIWS Trust Order, initiated by BGF through the Tokyo Compact at Interop Tokyo on June 12, 2026, already sets out that architecture:
- an AI Incident Exchange for reporting
- an Emergency Protocol
- a Designated Human Answerer who holds the authority to stop a system and answers for it
- the AIWS Trust Observatory for independent evaluation and early warning, grounded in society’s right to know
→ Read: Beacon Papers No. 12, The AI Race Needs a Trust Order, and No. 13, AI Power Must Not Operate Unseen
by Editor BGF | Oct 5, 2026 | News, Shaping Futures
Work can be delegated. Answerability cannot.
At DevDay on September 29, 2026, OpenAI introduced agents that can take on ongoing responsibilities. It also opened ChatGPT as a shared surface where people and agents work together, reaching some 1.2 billion users each week.
The shift is not in capability but in role. Until now, AI performed tasks: a person asked, and the system answered. Now AI begins to hold responsibilities that continue after the person has turned away. This changes the question humanity must ask.
A responsibility that runs over time must be defined before it begins: who granted it, what it covers, and when it ends. This is the constitutional mandate set out in Beacon Papers No. 11, No Power Without a Mandate. Every consequential action taken under it must also lead to a human being who can be called to account. That is the principle of Beacon Papers No. 10, No AI Agent Without Identity: no consequential AI action without a human answerer.
As AI moves from answering requests to carrying responsibilities, the measure of progress is whether human answerability keeps pace.
Read OpenAI’s DevDay 2026 recap →
by Editor BGF | Oct 5, 2026 | Shinzo Abe Initiative for Peace and Security, News
On September 29, 2026, the White House released the Accord on Super Intelligence, a short joint commitment signed by the President and by leaders of Google, Anthropic, Meta, OpenAI, xAI, and Nvidia. Companies training and deploying frontier models agreed to four layers of controls and audits: internal monitoring of capabilities and alignment, with attention to cybersecurity, biosecurity, and chemical threats; an internal team to verify that those controls work; independent external auditors; and an independent committee of the board to receive reports and require corrections. The text notes that, over time, these steps may be written into law.
The Accord is a meaningful commitment. Every layer, however, is organized by the companies themselves, and the text does not say who may stop a system, or who must answer to the public when a control fails.
On June 12 at Interop Tokyo, Yasuhide Nakayama proclaimed the Tokyo Compact, the founding constitutional charter of the AIWS Trust Order. Its principles begin with Human Responsibility and Meaningful Human Command and Human Dignity as the Supreme Standard, and include Trust as the Infrastructure of the AI Age, Trust Supremacy, and Human Command over Self-Improving Intelligence. It requires independent verification bodies protected from commercial and political pressure. It establishes the Trusted Pause: a pre-agreed, voluntary mechanism through which trusted partners may coordinate a temporary halt to training, scaling, or deployment, pending verification, when a frontier system threatens to exceed its verified capability limits in an uncontrolled manner or to defeat the safeguards of human command.
This distinction gives the Shinzo Abe Initiative for Peace and Security a concrete task in the AI Age: advancing a free and open order through trust infrastructure and meaningful human command. Prime Minister Abe received the World Leaders Award for Peace and Security on December 12, 2015, and the Initiative that bears his name carries forward work on cybersecurity, AI and digital governance, and a free and open order. That order cannot rest on corporate commitments alone.
The Accord records what firms will do inside their own walls. The Tokyo Compact builds what must stand outside them.
Sources:
by Editor BGF | Oct 5, 2026 | World Leader for Peace and Security, News, World Leaders in AIWS Award Updates
Professor Stuart Russell of UC Berkeley, an America 250: AI Pioneer and a Founding Signatory of The Boston Declaration, was among more than 200 signatories, including Geoffrey Hinton, to Minimum Conditions for Embedding Evaluators, an open letter published by the AI Evaluator Forum on September 18, 2026.
Responding to industry proposals to embed third-party evaluators within frontier AI companies, the letter sets five minimum conditions: meaningful independence, diverse expertise and viewpoints, transparency, protection against retaliation, and access comparable to that of senior employees conducting equivalent risk assessments. It also emphasizes that embedded evaluations must complement broader external oversight.
The call reinforces a principle BGF–AIWS articulated in Beacon Papers No. 4, Who May Verify?, published on July 27: AI power requires independent verification, and verifiers must themselves remain independent, accountable, and open to challenge.
On September 27, BGF–AIWS established the AIWS Trust Observatory, an independent civil-society mechanism to observe consequential AI power, warn of emerging danger, and call those responsible to act.
Independent evaluators inside frontier AI companies and an independent Observatory outside them serve complementary purposes: privileged access for rigorous assessment, and public scrutiny that connects evidence with responsibility.
Read the open letter →
by Editor BGF | Oct 5, 2026 | News
Speaking to artists and curators at the Vatican’s Consistory Hall on October 2, 2026, Pope Leo XIV called for a renewed alliance between the Church, artists, and cultural institutions to safeguard what is human in the age of artificial intelligence.
His address highlighted a danger extending beyond censorship: homogenization. Authentic art, he emphasized, opens deeper questions, nurtures listening, and expresses humanity’s aspirations, wounds, and search for meaning. He affirmed an ontological difference — “even before an aesthetic one” — between human artistic creation and what machines generate through statistical calculation.
For Boston Global Forum, this message resonates deeply with AIWS Civilization: each person and each culture has something unique to contribute, and technological progress must strengthen the conditions in which those contributions flourish.
Nine days earlier, at the Massachusetts State House, BGF launched the AIWS Human–AI Co-Creation Movement on a kindred conviction: AI trained on humanity’s data is drawn toward the average, yet no human being and no culture is average.
AIWS Human–AI Co-Creation places human purpose, cultural identity, judgment, and responsibility at the center of working with AI. AIWS Lumina, guided by Love, Creativity, Nobility, and Wisdom, cultivates the human qualities that give creation its meaning and direction.
Pope Leo’s appeal offers an important contribution to this civilizational dialogue: as AI’s capabilities expand, humanity must preserve and cultivate the sources of creativity that make each human contribution distinctive.
Read Pope Leo XIV’s full address on the Holy See’s website.
by Editor BGF | Oct 4, 2026 | Global Alliance for Digital Governance, Statements, Papers & Reports, News, Publications
To President Donald J. Trump
and the Honorable Michael Kratsios, Director, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy
Boston, October 4, 2026
The Boston Global Forum supports the President’s commitment to American leadership in artificial intelligence. The United States must build AI fast, build it strong, and remain the nation the world looks to for the frontier of this technology.
We welcome your September 29 meeting with technology and AI leaders and the White House Accord on Super Intelligence signed that day. Its commitments to internal controls, independent auditing, and board oversight create an opportunity to strengthen American AI leadership through verifiable safeguards.
Leadership at the frontier rests on one condition that speed alone cannot supply: trust. Americans, allies, and markets will rely on American AI to the degree they can verify what it does. On September 18, more than 200 signatories, including Geoffrey Hinton and Stuart Russell, an America 250: AI Pioneer, called for genuinely independent evaluation of frontier AI. Independent verification is what allows a nation to move fast without stopping to repair lost confidence.
Boston Global Forum and AIWS are ready to contribute.
On September 27, 2026, BGF–AIWS established the AIWS Trust Observatory, an independent civil-society institution that observes consequential AI power, compares public commitments with actions, and issues early warnings when evidence warrants. It is neither a regulator nor a form of self-oversight. Its findings carry evidence grades, those it observes have the right of reply, and no one under observation may fund it.
We offer the Administration the following:
- Independent early warning. The Observatory will share its evidence-graded alerts with the Office of Science and Technology Policy, so that risks are seen before they become incidents.
- Coordinated, independent evaluation. We will work alongside federal and industry evaluators on shared methods, while keeping the independence that gives evaluation its value.
- A Commitment Register. The Observatory is establishing a public Commitment Register tracking the safety commitments of frontier developers, including those made in the Accord, so that pledges made to the President and to the public can be checked against practice.
This work serves a larger purpose. Through Beacon Papers No. 8, BGF–AIWS set out AIWS Civilization, the Civilization of Human–AI Co-Creation, in which AI expands what human beings can do while people remain the authors of their lives and the holders of command. America’s leadership in AI should be measured not only by the power of its systems but by the strength of the civilization they help build. As the nation marks its 250th year, the United States can lead in both.
AI advances. Humanity must advance further.
We would welcome the opportunity to present the AIWS Trust Observatory to the Office of Science and Technology Policy at a working session in Washington or Boston, at your convenience.
Respectfully,
Nguyen Anh Tuan
Co-Founder, Co-Chair and CEO, Boston Global Forum,
Founder and Chief Architect, AIWS,
On behalf of the Leadership Board of the Boston Global Forum – AIWS
President Donald J. Trump hosts a luncheon on Super Intelligence (AI) in the East Room of the White House, Tuesday, September 29, 2026. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok.)
by Editor BGF | Oct 4, 2026 | Papers & Reports, News, Publications
Boston Global Forum and AIWS present Beacon Papers No. 14, “From a Method to a Civilization,” by Nguyen Anh Tuan, Founder and Chief Architect of AIWS and Co-Founder, Co-Chair and CEO of Boston Global Forum.
Human–AI co-creation has been studied and practiced within particular tasks and domains. Building on Beacon Papers No. 8, this new paper explains how BGF–AIWS establishes it as the organizing principle of AIWS Civilization—a comprehensive architecture connecting human development, culture, constitutional protections, trust infrastructure, institutions, cities, economic systems, and the silicon foundations of AI power.
Its central distinction is decisive: better output can conceal declining human capabilities. Genuine Human–AI Co-Creation must strengthen the person through four conditions: human authorship, Human-in-Command, the Human Advancement Test, and cultural identity.
The paper also connects these conditions with the Human–AI Co-Creation Movement and the AIWS badge framework, affirming that commitment is not certification: human advancement must be demonstrated through evidence.
Its Beacon Principle captures the purpose:
“Co-production makes things. Co-creation makes people. A civilization is measured by the people it makes.”
Readers are invited to download Beacon Papers No. 14 and read the full paper: https://bostonglobalforum.org/wp-content/uploads/Beacon_Papers_No14_From_a_Method_to_a_Civilization.pdf
