Shifting sands for AI in Europe: Spain unveils Europe’s first sandbox for artificial intelligence

by Editor | Jul 5, 2022 | Papers & Reports, News

Since its release in April 2021, the draft AI regulations (the “Regulations”), also referred to as the EU AI Act, have acted as a catalyst of legal, political, and societal developments within the field of AI. Forming the basis of many of the developing trends for AI in the European Union, the Regulations have received extensive feedback from stakeholders of all forms and functions, often with positive developments made (as was the case with the very definition of AI).

What remains constant in the shifting sands for AI in Europe is that the Regulations are set to stay and form the foundations for which man and machine are set to interact. While, understandably, there is a substantial level of restrictions contained within the Regulation, the provisions equally set out a number of initiatives to encourage the use and development of AI. One such initiative is the use of regulatory ‘sandboxes’ to allow stakeholders the chance to build, and develop, in the safety of regulatory isolation, without the substantial repercussions they would otherwise face should they fall foul of the Regulations once enacted.

Taking full advantage of this positive initiative, on the 27 June, the government of Spain announced at an event alongside the European Commission that they were to begin piloting the first (likely of many) regulatory sandbox on AI.

What is a regulatory sandbox?

As the European Commission puts it, a regulatory sandbox is a way to connect innovators and regulators by providing a controlled environment for them to interact and develop their operations. This will therefore permit them to develop, test, and validate AI systems with a view of ensuring compliance with the Regulations when they come into effect. On the other side of the spectrum, regulators are able to see the bottlenecks and sticking points of the way a regulation behaves in its current form. Changes can therefore be made as needed, after having extensive feedback and testing carried out by the involved parties. Much like a sandcastle, if a process is consistently incompatible with the Regulations, or the Regulations are found to be unsuitable in practice, they can be sculpted and remoulded to better meet the needs of the EU.

What benefit is expected?

The pilot initiated by the Spanish government is set to look at operationalising the requirements of the Regulations, alongside other features, such as conformity assessments and post-market activities.

The initiative is expected to create “easy-to-follow, future-proof best practice guidelines”, alongside an array of other practical guides and materials. These are expected to assist companies, particularly SMEs and start-ups reach, compliance with the provisions of the Regulations.

It is also expected that the results of the pilot will create guidance on methods to control and monitor compliance that can be used by each individual Member State’s national authorities.

When can stakeholders start building?

Testing is set to commence in October 2022 and the results are expected to be published in the second half of 2023. The experience collected from this sandbox will be presented in the form of newly developed ‘good practices’ and ‘implementation guidelines’ that will be made available to all Member States and the European Commission in anticipation for the full implementation of the Regulations.

Boston Global Forum (BGF), Club de Madrid and AI World Society (AIWS) established the Global Alliance for Digital Governance (GADG) in September 2021. This is a part of the Social Contract for the AI Age, Framework for AI International Accord, and Remaking the World – Toward an Age of Global Enlightenment.

https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=09cd19b8-ec89-429a-a55c-b6a5ae84ba49

Big Tech remains silent on questions about data privacy in a post-Roe US

by Editor | Jul 5, 2022 | Papers & Reports, News

A consequence relatively rarely discussed in the context of the US Supreme Court judgment on access and right to abortion, as affirmed in the earlier Roe v Wade case, is the question of the digital privacy of those who seek online information about the procedure or where it can be arranged. On June 24, the MIT Technology Review “asked five major tech companies—Alphabet, Meta, Reddit, TikTok, and Twitter—how their policies banning content promoting illegal activity will apply to posts advocating for abortion access or aiding those who now need to travel out of state for the procedure (and) how they plan to respond to requests, subpoenas, or warrants for data that could be used to prosecute cases related to abortions in those states.” This article from the Review shares and analyses the results of those queries.

https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/06/28/1055044/big-tech-data-privacy-supreme-court-dobbs-abortion/?truid=1637671ffcbfe11c6639153159007ef2

AIWS.net includes news reports, analysis and reflections by distinguished thinkers and innovators supporting innovations and solutions for “Remaking the World – Toward an Age of Global Enlightenment” and the United Nations Centennial initiative, looking at how the world might be in 2045 when the global organization completes a hundred years.